Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Gold Price's Largets Fall In 30 Years

By: Lyndon Core, Jeffery Robey


Over the last few days we noticed a pattern in the up to date market. The price of commodities in the recent week has plummeted at record amounts. Oil dropped 8% in 2 days Silver fell 16%, most in 17 months. The market is in a period of growth but how long will it be sustained? The market picked up points in the Dow and S&P the last few days but that was all erased on Monday 4/15. we decided to take a in depth look at gold. The major fall was gold with a 13% dive, most in 30 years, all of which happened the day before the Dow Jones reached an all-time record high. Dow fell almost 1.8% to erase the entire gain of the last week.

Here is a chart of the Dow Jones last few days:

Gold is most in demand for Jewelry and Investment but also used in the technology and medical fields for conductors and radiation resistor. because the Dow and S&P have been doing well gold is moving opposite because investors are bullish on the market. Gold out-performed the S&P 9 of the last 12 years. During times of crisis investors tend to move to Gold.
          Why is this? What this means is that as the dollar moves in a direction, gold price tends to move opposite. The gold price tends to have an inverse correlation to USd ($). This makes gold a good investment to diversify a portfolio. This supports the reason investors are turning to market stocks rather than investing in gold. Monetary policy before the housing crisis allowed gold to move closer with the market, and even in the first few weeks of the recession. After the policy was changed in the fall of 2008 gold price skyrocketed to near 1900$/oz. by 2011.
Since gold hit it’s high in September of 2011, the price has traded between the $1800 and $1500 range, but on Monday April 15th, after losing market traction on the previous Friday, the price of gold took its largest fall in over 30 years. Some have said that the gold bubble has finally popped, but why now?
Cyprus reported that it was going to sell large portions of its gold reserves to pay off outstanding debt. This was done by Cyprus to meet bailout conditions set by the EU. Other contributing causes were worse than expected economic data coming out of China (China being the largest purchaser of gold bullion, aka. huge source of gold demand), the rising US dollar, low domestic inflation, and rising market confidence in equities. All of these together, matched with positive sentiment on global economic/business growth led to gold largest single-day decline in over 3 decades.
But what does this mean and who does it affect? Well, Those largest negatively affected are the governments who own large reserves in gold, gold mining/processing companies, and people/funds that were heavily invested in gold. Although this most certainly seems like bad news, India is having a field day while it’s people flock to gold dispensaries to stock up while prices are low. India is the world’s largest commercial consumer of gold, which means boosts in demand for commercial items like jewelry. Worldwide demand for jewelry is likely to increase and create large profit margins for businesses.
So, where does the price of gold go from here? Given the nature of the large and sudden drop, it would make sense for a brief rally on gold. Investors will question whether the large drop is technically/fundamentally justified and markets may drive the price back up to test the waters. Many investors have been scared out of gold (supported by massive volumes on Monday) and it may take some time for investors to reclaim their confidence in the precious metal. In the long run, if global economic conditions remain stable and if equities continue to provide more attractive returns for investors, the price of gold will continue to fall. Only the markets will decide where to go from here.

Monday, April 22, 2013

Apple’s and Netflix’s market performance

Week Market Performance

All 10 groups in the S&P 500 declined. Technology stocks fell as Apple Inc. tumbled below $400 for the first time since 2011. The stock price of most of the top 10 firms with greater market capital like Apple, General Electric, Exxon Mobil, Microsoft and Google decreased yesterday. It is clear how the positive results in the S&P 500 is now swinging back the other way.



Financial News

Bad signs for Apple 




The stock has tanked more than 40% from a peak of $702 last September to a new low of about ~$400 yesterday.

Why so much pessimism around Apple?
  1. The company’s growth has vanished much faster than what investors and analysts anticipated. 
  2. Apple’s Gross margin dropped in the last year: 44% in Q1 2012, 47% in Q2 2012, 42% in Q3 2012, 40% in Q4 2012, 38% in Q1 2013 
  3. The CEO of the company is not a product visionary and has not articulated a vision of where he wants to take Apple going forward. 
  4. Some analysts expected the new iPhone to be released on June, but new rumors say the release will be on September. 
  5. Higher the bar, higher are the expectations. 
  6. Apple keeps $135 billion in cash. Investors claim some part of this money should come back to them through dividends. 
  7. Apple is being beaten in the fast-growing Indian smartphone market by a couple of aggressive local competitors. 

Apple Falls Below $400 as Supplier Reports IPhone Chip Glut – Cirrus Logic Inc. falls 15.69%







Cirrus makes sound components for the iPhone and iPad and Apple accounts for more than 90% of Cirrus Login Inc. revenue.

Cirrus Logic Inc. (Nasdaq: CRUS) announced two days ago a preliminary net revenue of as much as $170 million, less than analysts’ average $197.3 million estimate. The company also announced an inventory glut and that it will record a net inventory reserve of $23.3 million for the fourth quarter that ended in March. As a result its stock price went down nearly 16%

While the iPhone is the most popular handset, Samsung Electronics Co. has become the leading overall provider of smartphones by introducing a variety of devices with different designs and prices. For analysts, Apple is reducing expectations.

Cirrus yesterday reported preliminary fiscal first-quarter net revenue of as much as $170 million, less than analysts’ average $197.3 million estimate. Because Cirrus relies on Apple for most of its revenue, this suggests that the iPhone maker told the chipmaker to anticipate fewer orders.

Finally, iPad mini shipments are expected to drop as low as 30% in 2013 due to lack in demand.

Netflix performance in the last 3 weeks

03/26: Price went up to 197 dollars per share
  • Pacific Crest Securities analyst, Andy Hargreaves boosted his price target for Netflix to $225 per share due to the possibility that the number of subscribers of the online video streaming company will increase
  • Netflix is the best performing stock in the S&P 500 Index this year. The stock price of the company doubled due to investors’ optimism on its future profitability. (At the start of the year price was 98 and it reached its higher peak of 197 per share)

03/31: Price starts to fall
  • Netflix Face a Big Data Miner Shortage
  • Problems with content suppliers. (media holding companies like Sony and Starz, argue that Netflix is underpaying for the content they provide and are thinking about ending the deal they have )

04/03: Price collapsed to 159 dollars a share
  • Hastings will not face any sanction from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in connection with his action in announcing that the company streamed 1 billion hours of content in June, in his account on Facebook. Netflix did not inform its shareholders that it will use the CEO’s Facebook account to disclose information about the company. According to SEC, may use social media to announce important information about the company as long as investors are aware about it.
  • Online streaming video service getting even more crowded, as Time Warner is launching a streaming video competitor to chip away at Netflix’s market dominance.
  • Rumors said that activist investor Carl Icahn had sold some of his 10% stake in Netflix. Later Icahn denied the rumor.

04/9: There is a rebound in the stock price. On the 04/14 its price went up to 181 dollars per share
  • The company will introduce premium priced package. Such packages would enable the company to increase the amount of revenue each customer brings it.
  • Netflix and Hasbro Announce Expanded Multi-Year Kids Programming Agreement. Through this agreement, Netflix becomes the exclusive over the top streaming subscription destination in the US for five of Hasbro Studios most popular shows

04/17: Stock price falls down again and reach 169 dollars per share

  • Wedbush analysts said their bearish on Netflix for a few reasons. They believe the company will face some challenges in the second half of this year. In their view, the company will be hurt in the second half of the year because its two most high-profile exclusive series were both released in the first half of the year. They also said the company could continue expanding internationally, which would improve long-term growth but put a pause on near-term profitability.








Sources


Saturday, April 13, 2013


Bitcoin - a decentralized currency


Bitcoin is a virtual peer-to-peer currency that was launched in 2009. It had a meteoric rise in the last few weeks, following capital control regulations in Cyprus.

Bitcoin is generated by peer-to-peer technology. In other words, no central authority controls its use or monitors transactions. We refer to bitcoin as a cryptocurrency since it is based on digital cryptographic concepts.

Bitcoins are created by “miners”. It simply refers to computers running special programs that solve complex math problems at a predictable rate. Once a problem is solved, a bitcoin is rewarded. The number of bitcoins generated is halved every 5 years. Ultimately, they will reach their limit at 21 million in 2140. Since it is not backed by any government, its value lies in the fact that various individuals and businesses accept it as a form of payment. The currency was created by Sakoshi Nakamoto, but this name is believed to be a pseudonym.

Bitcoin gives an alternative over other traditional currencies and offers many benefits. It is not regulated. There is no exchange or regulatory body involved with it. Anyone can engage in transactions with no intermediaries. The counterparties are anonymous even though transactions are public. Since it is a relatively new concept, its use has not been specifically addressed by tax regulators like the IRS (tax benefits). Obviously, tax regulations like the capital gains taxes are applicable; but currency tax regulations are not because it has not been firmly established that bitcoins are currencies. Lastly, it offers an Alternative form of payment to other currencies with no control from a government or a central bank.

Due to its limited supply, bitcoin is a deflationary currency which tends to rise. Up to 73% of bitcoins are held in passive accounts.

What do they look like? 145A2geTXWhty9jyshsTHYh7STnbnkilxX. A bitcoin contains 34 characters starting with the letter 1 or 3.

Just this week, the total value of outstanding bitcoins has surpassed $2 billion. 2 weeks ago it was worth $1 billion.
The demand for bitcoins is going up, and with limited supply its value is skyrocketing.

Historically, bitcoin has increased 3800% in value. It started trading 0.3 cents in 2009 when it was first launched. Bitcoins absolutely exploded in value earlier this month following the announcement of capital regulations in Cyprus. Cypriot investors poured their money into an alternative currency. Today, buying a bitcoin on the major U.S. exchange, Mt. Gox, costs more than $200.

Bitcoin is a highly volatile financial instrument compared to other commodities in the financial market. As stated earlier, in just the past few days, its market value has increased more than 50%. This is an amazing volatility for a commodity, much less a currency.

bitcoin may or may not be a bubble, but it certainly offers a financial opportunity for savvy investors. There is a strong belief among speculators that bitcoin is just a bubble. However, it could potentially become the money of the future. In fact, the disbelief in a new technology is not something new itself. To their discredit, many people were skeptical about the use of plastic cards in the 60’s. Today, credit card transactions have surpassed cash and/or checks.

Even if bitcoin does not last, the four-year-old currency may be pointing to a future where digital money will be the norm. It has certainly changed the way we deal with currency, since it is a decentralized system. Even if bitcoins go under, the era of a pure digital currency which doesn’t have its antecedents in the physical world, is here to stay. We might see more of these.

As such, litecoin, a new cryptocurrency that is based on bitcoin is already being issued.

As the Bitcoin network approaches maximum supply, the expectations of bitcoin prices would change; vendors may be no longer willing to accept bitcoins.

Like any investments, there are a few risks associated with the use of bitcoin.

Due to hacking, it poses a serious threat for investors. On April 1st, Instawallet, a site that offered a service to allow people to store bitcoins, its site had been hacked. Instawallet posted a notice on its site on April 1, saying it was down for maintenance, raising suspicions among investors. The stock fell from $147 to $125 in a couple hours.

Similarly, a bitcoin investor lost 25,000 bitcoins, worth about half a million Dollars back in June 2011. Though it is difficult to mine a bitcoin, and many people can spend quite a long time and a significant amount of computing power to get, they aren’t exactly difficult to steal, as opposed to real-life, tangible money. All one needs in order to steal them is access to the owner’s computer. Because bitcoins are traded through a decentralized network without any sort of authorities, and the addresses used to send and receive bitcoins are not linked to any identity, once bitcoins are stolen, it is pretty much impossible to get them back. This presents a major flaw for the currency and potential investors.

Lastly, there is a risk of a government crackdown. Because of illegal activities, money laundering and the fact that governments don’t like competition very much, they might attempt to bring down bitcoin. Since it is a decentralized currency, governments cannot just close it down directly; however it can undermine confidence by accepting anti-bitcoin law, closing exchanges, or restrict businesses from accepting it as a form a payment (by enacting law).

http://www.businessinsider.com/presentation-what-is-bitcoin-2013-3#and-start-with-basics-2
http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/boom-of-digital-currency-bitcoin-raises-questions-of-stability-a-893342.html
http://www.geekosystem.com/first-major-bitcoin-theft/
http://www.dailytech.com/Inside+the+MegaHack+of+Bitcoin+the+Full+Story/article21942.htm
http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/366/what-methods-could-a-government-use-to-shutdown-bitcoin
http://venturebeat.com/2011/06/08/government-crackdown-on-bitcoin/
http://seekingalpha.com/article/1070891-do-bitcoins-pose-a-threat-to-paypal-visa-and-mastercard
http://qz.com/72118/yes-people-are-hoarding-bitcoins/
http://eprint.iacr.org/2012/584.pdf
https://medium.com/money-banking/2b5ef79482cb




Thursday, April 11, 2013

General Electrics Acquisition of Lufkin Industries


Market activity

Last week, major indexes fell from record highs, with the DJIA down 13.52, S&P 500 down 15.92 as of Monday April 8th. On Friday, disappointing labor market numbers were announced.  Only 88,000 jobs were added last month, which was the lowest since June.  The unemployment rate fell to a four-year low of 7.6%, but it was mainly due to workers leaving labor force.  Labor participation rate dropped to 63.3%, a 34 year low.

The Commerce Department announced that new orders for factory goods sharply increased in February.  Monsanto announced 15% in revenue growth to 5.47 billion, better than what analysts projected. Conagra announced profits dropped to $120 million last quarter, compared to $280 million this period last year. Greenbrier announced profits fell 22% last quarter due to 27% fall in deliveries.

General Electric Acquisition of Lufkin

On Monday, April 8, General Electric announced that they would be acquiring Lufkin Industries for $2.98 Billion. The market reacted positively to this, with Lufkin is up 37% on Monday following this announcement, and GE up .5%.

General Electric is an American multinational conglomerate corporation headquartered in Fairfield, Connecticut. The company operates through four segments: Energy, Technology, Infrastructure, and Capital Finance. It is currently listed as the 3rd largest in the, with a market cap of $237.60 billion. Stock Currently trades at $22.87/share.  After buying Lufkin, GE will still have $120 billion in cash.

Lufkin Industries is a manufacturing company based out of Lufkin, Texas. They produce machinery like power transmission gearboxes, oilfield pumping units, and oilfield electrical equipment. Lufkin’s lift technologies are used in 94% of the one million oil wells worldwide and have 4500 employees in over 40 countries. They had $1.3 billion in revenue and 37% improvement in 2012. The stock is trading at $88.00 as of Monday, April 8, up from $63.93.

Why buy Lufkin Industries?

GE’s CEO Jeff Immelt has indicated a desire to use GE’s cash balance to buy mid-sized companies that fit with what they’re doing. Buying Lufkin (LUFK) will greatly increase GE’s presence in the fast growing market to extract oil and natural gas from shale rock. This is a key part of Immelt’s plan to focus more on growth in the energy- rich shale fields of North Dakota, and Texas. Last year Immelt told analysts, Natural gas Development “is the place to play both in terms of the U.S. and the rest of the world,” GE sees the oil pump market growing 12% to 13% each year for the next 10 years and the conglomerate wants to make Lufkin's products available abroad. Oil and Gas is GE’s fastest growing business in 2012. Their revenues are over $15 billion and new orders are growing by 16%. Last week they announced plans to build a Global Research Center focusing on oil and gas technology advancements. Since 2007 they have made an $11 billion investment in the oil and gas sector. Their revenue was $1.92 billion in 2012.

GE has spent more than $11 billion in the last six years to expand its energy business. The energy segment accounts for 10% of GE's total revenue. So it's no surprise the Lufkin deal is GE's first major acquisition since the conglomerate sold its stake in NBC Universal in February. GE will acquire new lift types (hydraulics, progressive cavity pumps) and well automotive and production optimization technology. “The artificial lift segment is at the heart of critical changes that are helping producers maximize well potential-which translates into increased output at lower operational cost.”-Daniel Heintzelman, GE Oil & Gas president.

What does this mean for the US?
It reinforces the fact that the energy boom in the US is legitimate. U.S. oil output is expected to top Saudi Arabia's in 2020, according to the International Energy Agency. ExxonMobil says that by 2025, North America will be a net energy exporter to the rest of the world…the OPEC of the Americas. This will be good for the US economy in the next decade. Jobs will come back from overseas due to cheap energy costs.

U.S to Become Biggest Oil and Natural Gas Producer



Increase in Global Demand for Energy

The IEA said it expects global energy demand to increase by more than a third by 2035, with China, India and the Middle East accounting for 60% of the growth and more than outweighing reduced demand in developed economies.

Conclusion

GE wants to become the leader in energy production in the United States. They bought Lufkin Industries at a premium because they believe that growth in the industry will be enormous in next few decades. Rising cost of oil and gas production will give GE opportunity to offer its products and services in those fields.

Bibliography


Thursday, April 4, 2013

Insider Trading at SAC Capital Advisors


Introduction: SAC Capital Advisors


SAC Capital Advisors, founded by Steven A. Cohen in 1992, is a $14 billion hedge fund based in Stamford, CT. The company favors investing in the technology, industrial, financial, and healthcare sectors, particularly biotech and pharmaceutical companies. With at least 20 million shares traded a day, trading accounts for as much as 3% of NYSE. While SAC Capital charges higher management fees than rival hedge funds (and thus pays brokers higher commissions), its net returns of 13% for investors have also been higher than other hedge funds in 2012.

Over the past several years, the Justice Department and the Securities & Exchange Commission have launched investigations into insider trading across the financial sector. Several SAC Capital employees (or former employees) have been indicted so far, including Mathew Martoma and Michael Steinberg.

Insider Trading at SAC Capital: Mathew Martoma

Martoma, who worked at SAC Capital’s SR Intrinsic Investors unit until 2010, was arrested in November 2012, and charged with conspiracy and securities fraud in a record-setting insider trading scandal. Allegedly, the former portfolio manager received secret information from a doctor about clinical trials for an Alzheimer’s drug being developed by two pharmaceuticals, Elan Corp and Wyeth. Upon learning of the positive results, he bought these shares for his portfolio. Worrisome results from the doctor (involving patients and their serious side effects) followed however, and prompted Martoma to sell the pharmaceutical shares and build a short position in the two stocks. As expected, these stocks dropped upon announcements of trial results, enabling Martoma to profit and avoid losses totaling $276 million.

Recent Development: Michael Steinberg

Steinberg, a portfolio manager at SAC’s Sigma Capital Management unit where he oversaw more than $1 billion, was arrested Friday, March 29, 2013 on 5 counts of securities fraud and conspiracy. His indictment makes him the most senior employee at SAC Capital to be involved in the insider trading probe, although he had been implicated earlier in 2012 and had been on paid leave at the company since September. The arrest and guilty plea of Jon Horvath, a former SAC Capital analyst who reported to Steinberg, brought to light the emails he sent to Steinberg (and another SAC Capital fund manager) that generated about $1.4 million in illegal profits. Steinberg shorted Dell securities in August 2008 based on the information from Horvath that Dell would miss earnings estimates in the second quarter. Stocks of a semiconductor company, Nvidia, were also traded based on inside information in May 2009.

Effect on SAC Capital Advisors and the Future of Steven Cohen

Last month, outside investors began redeeming up to $1.68 billion from SAC Capital Advisors. Client defections mean that about 70% of the hedge fund’s assets under management come from within the firm, mostly Cohen’s own capital. So far nine current or former employees have been charged (or at least implicated) with insider trading, and four have pleaded guilty. But the company is actually still doing well. Needless to say, however, insider trading probes could hurt SAC Capital’s reputation.

The US Government could use Steinberg and Martoma to get to Steven Cohen, who seems to be the ultimate person of interest in the SAC Capital probe. While Cohen has not been charged with anything thus far or directly implicated, he is referred to in court filings as the “owner”, and is alleged to have collaborated with Martoma. Most importantly, the SEC claims that Cohen took a large position in the pharmaceutical companies in his personal portfolio based on Martoma’s advice. Investigations are ongoing, and the company asserts that its owner is not guilty of any wrongdoing.

What could Cohen do? He could close down SAC Capital to outside investors, which would mean less public scrutiny. The government, of course, could still go after profits they believe were gained through illegal activity. But all of the investigations aside, Cohen is still running a successful hedge fund. And according to an attorney, shutting down SAC may be sending the wrong message.

Sources




General Market Conditions

Recent successive climbing of the U.S stock market reflected in the major indexes such as DJIA and S&P 500 actually indicates the warm of the market and the increase of investors’ confidence. Last Friday, the US Department of Commerce revised and finalized the real GDP growth rate from 0.1 to 0.4 for the fourth quarter of 2012. Overall, the GDP growth rate increased from 1.8 in 2011 to 2.2 in 2012, forecasting up trend in the general economy. All combined together led to the record breaking both for DJIA and S&P 500 in terms of daily closing and intraday point. However, according to ADP National Employment Report for the past March issued this Wednesday, only 158,000 new jobs were created by private sector, falling short of previous expectations and behaving worse compared to previous months. After the issuing, the stock market went down a little bit. The official non-farm payroll report that is due this Friday will reveal more on recent employment situation, which might be reflected in near future market trend.



Tao Tang and Kevin Kivrak

Monday, April 1, 2013

Pepsi, What’s Next?


Shares of PepsiCo (PEP) opened high and climbed 3.27% last Friday. The stock was hovering near its 52-week high.



What caused the jump?

Six hours before the New York market opened, the Telegraph reported that Nelson Peltz' Trian Management Fund had been building stakes in excess of $2 billion in both PepsiCo and Mondelez.  And, the size of the holdings under the activist investor's control could be even larger, when taking the special purpose vehicles of other investors into consideration.  

Nelson Peltz is well known as a daring and risk-taking investor who likes strategic change and takes on company boards.  Peltz has a history of making large acquisitions in the food industry and then forcing change from within.

What does this mean for Pepsi?

Peltz may push for a $170 billion merger between Pepsi and Mondelez, for PepsiCo to spin-merge, or for neither.

The effects of a merger would be significant, consolidating distribution networks could result in cost savings of $3.4 billion.  A merged company would benefit from distribution and production synergies, and would broaden regional access for both companies.

However, both companies have been strong performers in the market over the last year and would not want to undergo a major M&A, and a major merger could present antitrust concerns.  Additionally, Mondelez has an array of individual products that could be too complicated "to appeal to a larger suitor at this time," JP Morgan analyst Ken Goldman says.

A spin-merge may be another option that would address antitrust concerns while still taking advantage of the benefits of a merger.  Goldman Sachs’ analyst J. Hong has suggested that the most likely strategy would involve splitting PepsiCo into three focused companies (Beverages, Snacks, and Nutrition), and then merging the New SnacksCo with Mondelez.

Why would Pepsi not want to merge or split?  

A  merger between PepsiCo and Mondelez seems to be reasonable, and has even been called a “big snack deal.”  

Chief Officer Hugh Johnston of Pepsi argues that, "We certainly wouldn't want to make a change in the business structure while there's still opportunities to unlock value."  PepsiCo previously fended off calls from investors and industry analysts arguing that it benefited from scale and embarked instead on a restructuring of its struggling beverage unit.

Last month, Pepsi revealed a stronger-than-expected 17% jump in fourth-quarter profits. The turnaround plan worked, and Pepsi is predicting the earnings will climb up 7% this year with the launch of the redesigned beverage packaging, improved mid-calorie Pepsi Next, movement into the energy drink market, and a new all-natural sweetener.

What is Peltz thinking?

It’s possible that Peltz has no intention of pushing for a merger.  Peltz has previously invested large amounts in companies without then pushing for large changes.  PepsiCo is projected to continue doing well and would be a wise investment, and Peltz already owned a significant stake in Mondelez as a result of his previous Cadbury acquisition.

Another possibility is that Peltz is much more interested in the effect this could have on Mondelez than that which it could have on PepsiCo.  Already an owner in Mondelez with a demonstrated interest in snacks - in 2007 he acquired 3% of Cadbury before pushing it to merge with Kraft and then pushing for a split into Kraft and Mondelez - he would benefit from a merger between Mondelez and a Pepsi-Snack-split company.  He may be convincing enough to strong-arm Pepsi into a future split.

What does this mean for Pepsi’s stock?  Will the stock price continue to go up or it will turn around?

Morgan analyst Ken Goldman warned that everyone should take Peltz’s potential interest seriously, but retail investors should keep in mind that there are many players in the pool.  At the end of the fourth quarter, a handful of key hedge fund managers had increased their stakes on PepsiCo.

If we look at the market response recently, we see that the stock price has gone up and down after the news broke out last Friday. The most significant changes occurred on Friday, with the stock jump, and yesterday, with a big drop of the stock price.  Investors clearly responded to this news.  

Why the drop?

It is both possible that some people took this chance to maximize their profits and sell their stocks, moving their money away while the price was high.

Big money may be playing its game – they’re preparing for a higher price, but before that, they need to press down the price and scare some people away.

But prices in both stocks are still on the rise.


References:

http://beta.fool.com/mhargra/2013/03/27/billionaire-nelson-peltz-is-pushing-together-monde/28201/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/9947125/Nelson-Peltz-plots-112bn-Cadbury-merger.html








http://www.insidermonkey.com/blog/mondelez-international-inc-mdlz-here’s-why-you-should-put-pepsico-inc-pep-in-your-portfolio-96821/